[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240222081231.213406-3-nylon.chen@sifive.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 16:12:30 +0800
From: Nylon Chen <nylon.chen@...ive.com>
To: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
conor@...nel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
palmer@...belt.com,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
thierry.reding@...il.com,
u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de
Cc: vincent.chen@...ive.com,
zong.li@...ive.com,
nylon.chen@...ive.com,
nylon7717@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH v9 2/3] pwm: sifive: change the PWM algorithm
The `frac` variable represents the pulse inactive time, and the result
of this algorithm is the pulse active time.
Therefore, we must reverse the result.
The reference is SiFive FU740-C000 Manual[0]
Link: https://sifive.cdn.prismic.io/sifive/1a82e600-1f93-4f41-b2d8-86ed8b16acba_fu740-c000-manual-v1p6.pdf [0]
Co-developed-by: Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
Co-developed-by: Vincent Chen <vincent.chen@...ive.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Chen <vincent.chen@...ive.com>
Signed-off-by: Nylon Chen <nylon.chen@...ive.com>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c
index eabddb7c7820..a586cfe4191b 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c
@@ -110,9 +110,10 @@ static int pwm_sifive_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
struct pwm_state *state)
{
struct pwm_sifive_ddata *ddata = pwm_sifive_chip_to_ddata(chip);
- u32 duty, val;
+ u32 duty, val, inactive;
- duty = readl(ddata->regs + PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCMP(pwm->hwpwm));
+ inactive = readl(ddata->regs + PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCMP(pwm->hwpwm));
+ duty = (1U << PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH) - 1 - inactive;
state->enabled = duty > 0;
@@ -123,7 +124,7 @@ static int pwm_sifive_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
state->period = ddata->real_period;
state->duty_cycle =
(u64)duty * ddata->real_period >> PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH;
- state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED;
+ state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
return 0;
}
@@ -139,7 +140,7 @@ static int pwm_sifive_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
int ret = 0;
u32 frac;
- if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
+ if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
return -EINVAL;
cur_state = pwm->state;
@@ -159,6 +160,7 @@ static int pwm_sifive_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
frac = DIV64_U64_ROUND_CLOSEST(num, state->period);
/* The hardware cannot generate a 100% duty cycle */
frac = min(frac, (1U << PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH) - 1);
+ frac = (1U << PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH) - 1 - frac;
mutex_lock(&ddata->lock);
if (state->period != ddata->approx_period) {
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists