linux-kernel - [PATCH v9 2/3] pwm: sifive: change the PWM algorithm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 16:12:30 +0800
From: Nylon Chen <nylon.chen@...ive.com>
To: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
	conor@...nel.org,
	robh+dt@...nel.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
	palmer@...belt.com,
	paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
	aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
	thierry.reding@...il.com,
	u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de
Cc: vincent.chen@...ive.com,
	zong.li@...ive.com,
	nylon.chen@...ive.com,
	nylon7717@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH v9 2/3] pwm: sifive: change the PWM algorithm

The `frac` variable represents the pulse inactive time, and the result
of this algorithm is the pulse active time.
Therefore, we must reverse the result.

The reference is SiFive FU740-C000 Manual[0]

Link: https://sifive.cdn.prismic.io/sifive/1a82e600-1f93-4f41-b2d8-86ed8b16acba_fu740-c000-manual-v1p6.pdf [0]

Co-developed-by: Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
Co-developed-by: Vincent Chen <vincent.chen@...ive.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Chen <vincent.chen@...ive.com>
Signed-off-by: Nylon Chen <nylon.chen@...ive.com>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c
index eabddb7c7820..a586cfe4191b 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c
@@ -110,9 +110,10 @@ static int pwm_sifive_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 				struct pwm_state *state)
 {
 	struct pwm_sifive_ddata *ddata = pwm_sifive_chip_to_ddata(chip);
-	u32 duty, val;
+	u32 duty, val, inactive;
 
-	duty = readl(ddata->regs + PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCMP(pwm->hwpwm));
+	inactive = readl(ddata->regs + PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCMP(pwm->hwpwm));
+	duty = (1U << PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH) - 1 - inactive;
 
 	state->enabled = duty > 0;
 
@@ -123,7 +124,7 @@ static int pwm_sifive_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	state->period = ddata->real_period;
 	state->duty_cycle =
 		(u64)duty * ddata->real_period >> PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH;
-	state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED;
+	state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -139,7 +140,7 @@ static int pwm_sifive_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	int ret = 0;
 	u32 frac;
 
-	if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
+	if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	cur_state = pwm->state;
@@ -159,6 +160,7 @@ static int pwm_sifive_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	frac = DIV64_U64_ROUND_CLOSEST(num, state->period);
 	/* The hardware cannot generate a 100% duty cycle */
 	frac = min(frac, (1U << PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH) - 1);
+	frac = (1U << PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH) - 1 - frac;
 
 	mutex_lock(&ddata->lock);
 	if (state->period != ddata->approx_period) {
-- 
2.43.0