linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/206] 6.1.79-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20c84ea4-cebc-82ba-827d-34c956e9faf6@kalrayinc.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 11:01:23 +0100
From: Yann Sionneau <ysionneau@...rayinc.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
 lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
 f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net,
 rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/206] 6.1.79-rc2 review

Hi Greg,

On 2/21/24 14:03, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.79 release.
> There are 206 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:01:46 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.79-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,

I tested 6.1.79-rc2 (64fdfe5f1a1d) on Kalray kvx arch (not upstream yet) : I had to patch `arch/kvx/include/asm/jump_label.h` to get it to compile because of the "asm goto" changes but apart from that everything looks good!

It ran on real hw (k200, k200lp and k300 boards), on qemu as well as on our internal instruction set simulator (ISS).

Tests were run on several interfaces/drivers (usb, qsfp ethernet, eMMC, PCIe endpoint+RC, SPI, remoteproc, uart, iommu). LTP and uClibc-ng testsuites are also run without any regression.

Everything looks fine to us.

Tested-by: Yann Sionneau<ysionneau@...rayinc.com>

Thanks a lot!

-- 

Yann