linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] selftests/resctrl: Simplify cleanup in ctrl-c handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 12:13:50 +0200 (EET)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>
cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, 
    Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, 
    LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] selftests/resctrl: Simplify cleanup in ctrl-c
 handler

On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Maciej Wieczor-Retman wrote:
> 
> > Ctrl-c handler isn't aware of what test is currently running. Because of
> > that it executes all cleanups even if they aren't necessary. Since the
> > ctrl-c handler uses the sa_sigaction system no parameters can be passed
> > to it as function arguments.
> > 
> > Add a global variable to make ctrl-c handler aware of the currently run
> > test and only execute the correct cleanup callback.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>
> > ---

> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
> > index 5a49f07a6c85..d572815436f3 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
> > @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct imc_counter_config {
> >  static char mbm_total_path[1024];
> >  static int imcs;
> >  static struct imc_counter_config imc_counters_config[MAX_IMCS][2];
> > +const struct resctrl_test *current_test;
> 
> static const struct
> 
> >  void membw_initialize_perf_event_attr(int i, int j)
> >  {
> > @@ -472,7 +473,7 @@ void ctrlc_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *info, void *ptr)
> >  	if (bm_pid)
> >  		kill(bm_pid, SIGKILL);
> >  	umount_resctrlfs();
> > -	tests_cleanup();
> > +	current_test->cleanup();
> 
> These calls should have if (current_test->cleanup()) guard. Isn't the 

Err, if (current_test->cleanup) is what I meant.

> non-contiguous already test w/o the cleanup function?
> 
> Other than those two, this looked okay.

-- 
 i.