linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] ACPI: thermal_lib: Add missing checks for errors in return code ret

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7c78e205-d798-4ce6-82b6-9d03737d3734@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:26:58 +0000
From: "Colin King (gmail)" <colin.i.king@...il.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
 linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] ACPI: thermal_lib: Add missing checks for errors in
 return code ret

On 22/02/2024 10:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 2:19 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Btw, in real life, in 2024, the compiler is going to automatically
>> initialize "temp_decik" to zero.  So we could just do:
>>
>> -       int temp_decik;
>> +       int temp_decik = 0;
>>
>> That would silence the warning without affecting anything else at all.
> 
> Sounds good to me.
> 
> Anyone willing to cut a patch for this?

will do