linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 13/16] nvmet-fc: do not tack refs on tgtports from assoc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zdc84CT6LXmbz2DQ@sashalap>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 07:24:00 -0500
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
	james.smart@...adcom.com, sagi@...mberg.me, kch@...dia.com,
	linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 13/16] nvmet-fc: do not tack refs on
 tgtports from assoc

On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 08:08:51PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
>Hi!
>
>> From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit 1c110588dd95d21782397ff3cbaa55820b4e1fad ]
>>
>> The association life time is tied to the life time of the target port.
>> That means we should not take extra a refcount when creating a
>> association.
>
>I don't see this one queued for 6.1 or 6.6. What went wrong here?

Yup, this should have been dropped from all trees. Thanks!


-- 
Thanks,
Sasha