[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r0h4tzeq.fsf@all.your.base.are.belong.to.us>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:13:33 +0100
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>
To: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>, Palmer Dabbelt
<palmer@...belt.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Thomas
Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof
Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Frank Rowand
<frowand.list@...il.com>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Atish
Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Andrew Jones
<ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 11/18] irqchip: Add RISC-V incoming MSI controller
early driver
Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com> writes:
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-state.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-state.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0c19ffb9ca3e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-state.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,870 @@
[...]
> +static void __imsic_local_sync(struct imsic_local_priv *lpriv)
> +{
> + struct imsic_local_config *mlocal;
> + struct imsic_vector *vec, *mvec;
> + int i;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&lpriv->lock);
> +
> + /* This pairs with the barrier in __imsic_remote_sync(). */
> + smp_mb();
I'm trying to figure out why this barrier is needed? All the updates are
done behind the spinlocks. If there're some ordering constraints that
I'm missing, please document them.
> +
> + for_each_set_bit(i, lpriv->dirty_bitmap, imsic->global.nr_ids + 1) {
> + if (!i || i == IMSIC_IPI_ID)
> + goto skip;
> + vec = &lpriv->vectors[i];
> +
> + if (READ_ONCE(vec->enable))
> + __imsic_id_set_enable(i);
> + else
> + __imsic_id_clear_enable(i);
> +
> + /*
> + * If the ID was being moved to a new ID on some other CPU
> + * then we can get a MSI during the movement so check the
> + * ID pending bit and re-trigger the new ID on other CPU
> + * using MMIO write.
> + */
> + mvec = READ_ONCE(vec->move);
> + WRITE_ONCE(vec->move, NULL);
mvec = xchg(&vec->move, NULL) ?
> + if (mvec && mvec != vec) {
> + if (__imsic_id_read_clear_pending(i)) {
> + mlocal = per_cpu_ptr(imsic->global.local, mvec->cpu);
> + writel_relaxed(mvec->local_id, mlocal->msi_va);
> + }
> +
> + imsic_vector_free(&lpriv->vectors[i]);
> + }
> +
> +skip:
> + bitmap_clear(lpriv->dirty_bitmap, i, 1);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void imsic_local_sync_all(void)
> +{
> + struct imsic_local_priv *lpriv = this_cpu_ptr(imsic->lpriv);
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lpriv->lock, flags);
> + bitmap_fill(lpriv->dirty_bitmap, imsic->global.nr_ids + 1);
> + __imsic_local_sync(lpriv);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpriv->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +void imsic_local_delivery(bool enable)
> +{
> + if (enable) {
> + imsic_csr_write(IMSIC_EITHRESHOLD, IMSIC_ENABLE_EITHRESHOLD);
> + imsic_csr_write(IMSIC_EIDELIVERY, IMSIC_ENABLE_EIDELIVERY);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + imsic_csr_write(IMSIC_EIDELIVERY, IMSIC_DISABLE_EIDELIVERY);
> + imsic_csr_write(IMSIC_EITHRESHOLD, IMSIC_DISABLE_EITHRESHOLD);
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +static void imsic_local_timer_callback(struct timer_list *timer)
> +{
> + struct imsic_local_priv *lpriv = this_cpu_ptr(imsic->lpriv);
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lpriv->lock, flags);
> + __imsic_local_sync(lpriv);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpriv->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static void __imsic_remote_sync(struct imsic_local_priv *lpriv, unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + lockdep_assert_held(&lpriv->lock);
> +
> + /*
> + * Ensure that changes to vector enable, vector move and
> + * dirty bitmap are visible to the target CPU.
..which case the spinlock(s) are enough, no?
> + *
> + * This pairs with the barrier in __imsic_local_sync().
> + */
> + smp_mb();
> +
> + /*
> + * We schedule a timer on the target CPU if the target CPU is not
> + * same as the current CPU. An offline CPU will unconditionally
> + * synchronize IDs through imsic_starting_cpu() when the
> + * CPU is brought up.
> + */
> + if (cpu_online(cpu)) {
> + if (cpu == smp_processor_id()) {
> + __imsic_local_sync(lpriv);
> + return;
> + }
Maybe move this if-clause out from the cpu_online(), and only have
something like
if (cpu_online(cpu) && !timer_pending(&lpriv->timer)) { ... }
inside the CONFIG_SMP guard...
> +
> + if (!timer_pending(&lpriv->timer)) {
> + lpriv->timer.expires = jiffies + 1;
> + add_timer_on(&lpriv->timer, cpu);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +#else
> +static void __imsic_remote_sync(struct imsic_local_priv *lpriv, unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + lockdep_assert_held(&lpriv->lock);
> + __imsic_local_sync(lpriv);
> +}
> +#endif
..where we can get rid of this special !SMP all together for this
function.
> +
> +void imsic_vector_mask(struct imsic_vector *vec)
> +{
> + struct imsic_local_priv *lpriv;
> +
> + lpriv = per_cpu_ptr(imsic->lpriv, vec->cpu);
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(&lpriv->vectors[vec->local_id] != vec))
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * This function is called through Linux irq subsystem with
> + * irqs disabled so no need to save/restore irq flags.
> + */
> +
> + raw_spin_lock(&lpriv->lock);
> +
> + vec->enable = false;
Should have WRITE_ONCE to make the checkers happy.
> + bitmap_set(lpriv->dirty_bitmap, vec->local_id, 1);
> + __imsic_remote_sync(lpriv, vec->cpu);
> +
> + raw_spin_unlock(&lpriv->lock);
> +}
> +
> +void imsic_vector_unmask(struct imsic_vector *vec)
> +{
> + struct imsic_local_priv *lpriv;
> +
> + lpriv = per_cpu_ptr(imsic->lpriv, vec->cpu);
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(&lpriv->vectors[vec->local_id] != vec))
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * This function is called through Linux irq subsystem with
> + * irqs disabled so no need to save/restore irq flags.
> + */
> +
> + raw_spin_lock(&lpriv->lock);
> +
> + vec->enable = true;
Dito.
> + bitmap_set(lpriv->dirty_bitmap, vec->local_id, 1);
> + __imsic_remote_sync(lpriv, vec->cpu);
> +
> + raw_spin_unlock(&lpriv->lock);
> +}
> +
> +static bool imsic_vector_move_update(struct imsic_local_priv *lpriv, struct imsic_vector *vec,
> + bool new_enable, struct imsic_vector *new_move)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + bool enabled;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lpriv->lock, flags);
> +
> + /* Update enable and move details */
> + enabled = READ_ONCE(vec->enable);
> + WRITE_ONCE(vec->enable, new_enable);
Again, xchg() would be easier to read.
Björn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists