linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250_dw: Do not reclock if already at correct rate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:04:22 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>
Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250_dw: Do not reclock if already at correct
 rate

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 11:26:34AM -0800, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> When userspace opens the console, we call set_termios() passing a
> termios with the console's configured baud rate. Currently this causes
> dw8250_set_termios() to disable and then re-enable the UART clock at
> the same frequency as it was originally. This can cause corruption
> of any concurrent console output. Fix it by skipping the reclocking
> if we are already at the correct rate.

Makes sense to me from code perspective.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko