[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e95cebb8f6a7ede5d40b4becf58cb578a5c4cf58.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 18:19:42 +0200
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov
<ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, John Fastabend
<john.fastabend@...il.com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin
KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song
<yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav
Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa
<jolsa@...nel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Benjamin Tissoires
<benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah
Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next v3 00/16] sleepable bpf_timer (was: allow
HID-BPF to do device IOs)
On Wed, 2024-02-21 at 17:25 +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> [Partly a RFC/formal submission: there are still FIXMEs in the code]
> [Also using bpf-next as the base tree for HID changes as there will
> be conflicting changes otherwise, so I'm personaly fine for the HID
> commits to go through bpf-next]
[...]
Could you please also add verifier selftests, e.g. extend
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/timer.c (bpf side)
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c (userspace side triggering
bpf side)
Negative tests could be added in
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/timer_failure.c
Please let me know if you need any help setting up local BPF test
environment, I have a short writeup on how to set it up in chroot.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists