linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] KVM: SEV: publish supported VMSA features

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <335d6086-2269-46b5-9e45-8707529213cd@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:25:57 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, michael.roth@....com,
 aik@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] KVM: SEV: publish supported VMSA features

On 2/23/24 17:07, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> And unless dead code elimination isn't as effective as I think it is,
> we don't even need any stubs since sev_guest() and sev_es_guest()
> are __always_inline specifically so that useless code can be elided.
> Or if we want to avoid use of IS_ENABLED(), we could add four stubs,
> which is still well worth it.

This particular #ifdef was needed to avoid a compilation failure, but 
I'll check your patches and include them.

Paolo