[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240223163901.13504-2-W_Armin@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:39:00 +0100
From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
To: Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com,
mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com
Cc: sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com,
hdegoede@...hat.com,
ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Do not use readl() for policy buffer access
The policy buffer is allocated using normal memory allocation
functions, so readl() should not be used on it.
Use get_unaligned_le32() instead.
Compile-tested only.
Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
---
drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
index 16973bebf55f..3220b6580270 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include <linux/debugfs.h>
#include <linux/tee_drv.h>
#include <linux/uuid.h>
+#include <asm/unaligned.h>
#include "pmf.h"
#define MAX_TEE_PARAM 4
@@ -249,8 +250,8 @@ static int amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
u32 cookie, length;
int res;
- cookie = readl(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_OFFSET);
- length = readl(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_LEN);
+ cookie = get_unaligned_le32(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_OFFSET);
+ length = get_unaligned_le32(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_LEN);
if (cookie != POLICY_SIGN_COOKIE || !length)
return -EINVAL;
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists