linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] of: property: fw_devlink: Add support for "post-init-providers" property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqLZbCJ3ziFFtq9V30rvCw_Y+-XUCJNXeHeRA8u76LYQuw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 10:37:39 -0700
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, 
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>, 
	Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>, Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, kernel-team@...roid.com, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] of: property: fw_devlink: Add support for
 "post-init-providers" property

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 5:04 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 5:32 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 03:30:24PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > > Add support for this property so that dependency cycles can be broken and
> > > fw_devlink can do better probe/suspend/resume ordering between devices in a
> > > dependency cycle.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > -     fwnode_link_add(of_fwnode_handle(con_np), of_fwnode_handle(sup_np), 0);
> > > +     fwnode_link_add(of_fwnode_handle(con_np), of_fwnode_handle(sup_np),
> > > +                     flags);
> >
> > I would leave it one line despite being 83 characters long.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > -                     of_link_to_phandle(con_dev_np, phandle);
> > > +                     of_link_to_phandle(con_dev_np, phandle,
> > > +                                        s->fwlink_flags);
> >
> > I would leave this on one line, it's only 81 characters.
>
> I don't have a strong opinion either way. If I need to send another
> revision out, I'll address this (if checkpatch doesn't complain).

My terminal is >80 chars, so 1 line is good.

Rob