[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8caed6ce-808a-4d25-823a-fc4d6b56268d@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:18:32 -0800
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>, Fenghua Yu
<fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
CC: <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] selftests/resctrl: Move cleanups out of individual
tests
Hi Maciej,
On 2/22/2024 4:07 AM, Maciej Wieczor-Retman wrote:
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
> index 161f5365b4f0..bae08d1221ec 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
> @@ -134,6 +134,8 @@ static void run_single_test(const struct resctrl_test *test, const struct user_p
> }
>
> ret = test->run_test(test, uparams);
> + if (test->cleanup)
> + test->cleanup();
> ksft_test_result(!ret, "%s: test\n", test->name);
>
> cleanup:
I think this can be potentially confusing to do cleanup here and
then follow it with a test_cleanup(). Could this test specific
cleanup perhaps be called from the general test_cleanup() instead?
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists