[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <170872283709.3880577.13004256445870612040.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 14:14:07 -0800
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] Run tests in parallel
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 19:41:47 -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> If command line option '-p' is provided, start/fork all tests in the
> main thread and then gather them in order at the end. On a laptop test
> time was reduced from 5 minutes 21 seconds to 1 minute 50 seconds. The
> option isn't default as the test shows up perf and test flakes.
>
> The '-v' option is modified so that 'perf test -v' will give verbose
> output only from failing tests.
>
> [...]
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Best regards,
--
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists