lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240223051302.177596-2-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:13:01 +0800
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
	Eric Badger <ebadger@...estorage.com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] iommu: Add static iommu_ops->release_domain

The current device_release callback for individual iommu drivers does the
following:

1) Silent IOMMU DMA translation: It detaches any existing domain from the
   device and puts it into a blocking state (some drivers might use the
   identity state).
2) Resource release: It releases resources allocated during the
   device_probe callback and restores the device to its pre-probe state.

Step 1 is challenging for individual iommu drivers because each must check
if a domain is already attached to the device. Additionally, if a deferred
attach never occurred, the device_release should avoid modifying hardware
configuration regardless of the reason for its call.

To simplify this process, introduce a static release_domain within the
iommu_ops structure. It can be either a blocking or identity domain
depending on the iommu hardware. The iommu core will decide whether to
attach this domain before the device_release callback, eliminating the
need for repetitive code in various drivers.

Consequently, the device_release callback can focus solely on the opposite
operations of device_probe, including releasing all resources allocated
during that callback.

Co-developed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
---
 include/linux/iommu.h |  1 +
 drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
index de839fd01bb8..e3d9365b0fa9 100644
--- a/include/linux/iommu.h
+++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
@@ -585,6 +585,7 @@ struct iommu_ops {
 	struct module *owner;
 	struct iommu_domain *identity_domain;
 	struct iommu_domain *blocked_domain;
+	struct iommu_domain *release_domain;
 	struct iommu_domain *default_domain;
 };
 
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index 210dc7b4c8cf..fb06c3f47320 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -459,6 +459,18 @@ static void iommu_deinit_device(struct device *dev)
 
 	iommu_device_unlink(dev->iommu->iommu_dev, dev);
 
+	/*
+	 * If the iommu driver provides release_domain then the core code
+	 * ensures that domain is attached prior to calling release_device.
+	 * Drivers can use this to enforce a translation on the idle iommu.
+	 * Usually the global static blocked_domain is a good choice.
+	 *
+	 * Anyway, if a deferred attach never happened then the release
+	 * should still avoid touching any hardware configuration either.
+	 */
+	if (!dev->iommu->attach_deferred && ops->release_domain)
+		ops->release_domain->ops->attach_dev(ops->release_domain, dev);
+
 	/*
 	 * release_device() must stop using any attached domain on the device.
 	 * If there are still other devices in the group they are not effected
-- 
2.34.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ