linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v17 36/51] ASoC: dt-bindings: Update example for enabling USB offload on SM8250

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 06:59:30 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
	Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>,
	srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, mathias.nyman@...el.com,
	perex@...ex.cz, conor+dt@...nel.org, corbet@....net,
	lgirdwood@...il.com, andersson@...nel.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com,
	bgoswami@...cinc.com, tiwai@...e.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 36/51] ASoC: dt-bindings: Update example for enabling
 USB offload on SM8250

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 04:50:08PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 05:24:58PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 17/02/2024 01:10, Wesley Cheng wrote:
> > > Add an example on enabling of USB offload for the Q6DSP.  The routing can
> > > be done by the mixer, which can pass the multimedia stream to the USB
> > > backend.
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>
> > > ---
> > >  .../devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,sm8250.yaml    | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> 
> > This broke next.
> 
> > Wesley, are you sure you explained dependencies in this patch? Why is
> > next failing on this now?
> 
> It's surprising to see this merged at all while the series is still in
> review?

I took the first 10 and then these dt patches as I thought those were
safe to take also given the review.  If I should revert them, I'll
gladly do so.

thanks,

greg k-h