[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZdhYc90uy7yuYrx2@pluto>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:33:55 +0000
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Oleksii Moisieiev <oleksii_moisieiev@...m.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol
protocol basic support
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 09:28:12AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 2:08 AM Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@....nxp.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Oleksii Moisieiev <oleksii_moisieiev@...m.com>
> >
> > Add basic implementation of the SCMI v3.2 pincontrol protocol.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
> > Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
> > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Oleksii Moisieiev <oleksii_moisieiev@...m.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>
> This looks ripe for merging for me, there are clearly dependencies in the SCMI
> firmware tree so I can't apply this to the pin control tree, but if
> someone creates
> an immutable branch from the SCMI firmware repo (based off v6.8-rc1 or so)
> I'm happy to also pull the branch into pin control.
>
Well, AFAIK there is another upcoming change in the v3.2 SCMI spec and
I am not sure if this series accounts for it...indeed the v3.2 -bet4 was
still pending fr feedback AFAIK (and I doubt latest changes are in since
they have been discussed like yesterday...)....but I maybe wrong, I will
chase for the final spec and look into this to verify if it is
compliant...
Anyway, given the particularly long history of changes in PINCTRL v3.2
SCMI I would wait to have the final spec officially frozen at this
point before merging....
Thanks,
Cristian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists