lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240223083903.42129-1-yangyicong@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 16:39:03 +0800
From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...wei.com>
To: <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <jirislaby@...nel.org>, <tony@...mide.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	<tglx@...utronix.de>, <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
	<prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>, <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
	<fanghao11@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4] serial: port: Don't suspend if the port is still busy

From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>

We accidently met the issue that the bash prompt is not shown after the
previous command done and until the next input if there's only one CPU
(In our issue other CPUs are isolated by isolcpus=). Further analysis
shows it's because the port entering runtime suspend even if there's
still pending chars in the buffer and the pending chars will only be
processed in next device resuming. We are using amba-pl011 and the
problematic flow is like below:

Bash                                         kworker
tty_write()
  file_tty_write()
    n_tty_write()
      uart_write()
        __uart_start()
          pm_runtime_get() // wakeup waker
            queue_work()
                                             pm_runtime_work()
                                               rpm_resume()
                                                status = RPM_RESUMING
                                                serial_port_runtime_resume()
                                                  port->ops->start_tx()
                                                    pl011_tx_chars()
                                                      uart_write_wakeup()
        […]
        __uart_start()
          pm_runtime_get() < 0 // because runtime status = RPM_RESUMING
                               // later data are not commit to the port driver
                                                status = RPM_ACTIVE
                                                rpm_idle() -> rpm_suspend()

This patch tries to fix this by checking the port busy before entering
runtime suspending. A runtime_suspend callback is added for the port
driver. When entering runtime suspend the callback is invoked, if there's
still pending chars in the buffer then flush the buffer.

Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Fixes: 84a9582fd203 ("serial: core: Start managing serial controllers to enable runtime PM")
Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>
---
Change since v3:
- Drop non-fix change in __serial_port_busy()
- Use a boolen busy instead of ret per Jiri
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240208075216.48915-1-yangyicong@huawei.com/

Change since v2:
- Narrow the spinlock region per Andy
- Make __serial_port_busy() return -EBUSY if port has pending chars per Andy
Thanks.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240206073322.5560-1-yangyicong@huawei.com/

Change since v1:
- Use port lock wrapper per John
- Flush the pending chars and return -EBUSY per Tony.
Thanks.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240204031957.58176-1-yangyicong@huawei.com/

 drivers/tty/serial/serial_port.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_port.c b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_port.c
index 88975a4df306..1843c9ef7c49 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_port.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_port.c
@@ -46,8 +46,33 @@ static int serial_port_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int serial_port_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct serial_port_device *port_dev = to_serial_base_port_device(dev);
+	struct uart_port *port;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	bool busy;
+
+	port = port_dev->port;
+
+	if (port->flags & UPF_DEAD)
+		return 0;
+
+	uart_port_lock_irqsave(port, &flags);
+	busy = __serial_port_busy(port);
+	if (busy)
+		port->ops->start_tx(port);
+	uart_port_unlock_irqrestore(port, flags);
+
+	if (busy)
+		pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
+
+	return busy ? -EBUSY : 0;
+}
+
 static DEFINE_RUNTIME_DEV_PM_OPS(serial_port_pm,
-				 NULL, serial_port_runtime_resume, NULL);
+				 serial_port_runtime_suspend,
+				 serial_port_runtime_resume, NULL);
 
 static int serial_port_probe(struct device *dev)
 {
-- 
2.24.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ