linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] checkpatch: Don't check for unified diff format in git sendemail headers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e51c5e6fe02bcc5a487cae063fe8f440013d0ca9.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 17:01:53 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, Dwaipayan Ray
 <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,  Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
 kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] checkpatch: Don't check for unified diff format in
 git sendemail headers

On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 16:45 -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 12:54 AM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, 2024-02-21 at 21:15 -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > > When checkpatch is used as a git sendemail-validate hook, it's also passed
> > > in the email header for sanity check.
> > 
> > Why?
> > 
> > If so, why not use a front-end script to stop/remove
> > the file from being scanned by checkpatch?
> 
> Sure, I could do that. But this also makes it easier for people to
> start using checkpatch. Or I can put up a git hook wrapper script in
> here for people to symlink into their .git/hooks that does this.
> 
> I'd prefer the lazy route of not creating a 1 line wrapper script :)

I'd not.  checkpatch is for _patches_.
Don't feed stuff to it that isn't patches and expect good results.