linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the xfs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240223140619.GA30519@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 15:06:19 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
	David Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
	Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the xfs tree

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 09:55:09AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> but it is very weird for the ones reading the text file. So, what
> we do instead for pointers is to escape the entire declaration, like:
> 
> 	``*inode``
> 	``struct inode *inode``
> 
> I hope that helps.

In this case it says *foliop for an argument that is a double pointer
and the comment refers to what it point to.  I'll see what I can do
there, but the whole italic and bold thing seems entirely pointless
for kerneldoc..