[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17265e7ace81d4e546a0b990d3e4723c6e6f4968.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 17:22:00 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, Dwaipayan Ray
<dwaipayanray1@...il.com>, Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] checkpatch: Don't check for unified diff format in
git sendemail headers
On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 17:10 -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 5:01 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 16:45 -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 12:54 AM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 2024-02-21 at 21:15 -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > > > > When checkpatch is used as a git sendemail-validate hook, it's also passed
> > > > > in the email header for sanity check.
> > > >
> > > > Why?
> > > >
> > > > If so, why not use a front-end script to stop/remove
> > > > the file from being scanned by checkpatch?
> > >
> > > Sure, I could do that. But this also makes it easier for people to
> > > start using checkpatch. Or I can put up a git hook wrapper script in
> > > here for people to symlink into their .git/hooks that does this.
> > >
> > > I'd prefer the lazy route of not creating a 1 line wrapper script :)
> >
> > I'd not. checkpatch is for _patches_.
> > Don't feed stuff to it that isn't patches and expect good results.
>
> Would you be open to being a maintainer if I add a git hook
> sendemail-validate wrapper? It feels silly to add myself as a
> maintainer for a 1-line script. I'd rather give it to you :)
<shrug>
I think you need a local script and not one in the tree.
Or maybe some different git invocation command. Dunno.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists