[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72=mCnm0mKOw5K44PmZ+jF=67jxEEkcXP-E0O8CaUrps=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 15:45:10 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, Ramon de C Valle <rcvalle@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] rust: make mutually exclusive with CFI_CLANG
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 2:38 PM Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> configuring a kernel without symmetrical support for kfi.
Nit: typo.
> This probably needs to go to stable. The correct fixes tag for that I am
> not sure of however, but since CFI_CLANG predates RUST, I blamed the
> commit adding rust support.
Cc'ing Matthew et al. in case this is a problem for them, but I guess
we can relax it later as needed.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists