[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <490c8499-c082-437a-88e4-2b66b27bb951@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 12:13:39 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, linux@...ck-us.net
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Zev Weiss <zev@...ilderbeest.net>,
Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>,
Peter Yin <peteryin.openbmc@...il.com>,
Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: hwmon/pmbus: ti,lm25066: document
regulators
On 23/02/2024 17:21, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>
> All devices documented in the lm25066 binding are intended for use with
> a regulator, be that for purely monitoring purposes (lm25056) or, for
> the other devices, as the controller of that regulator. The binding does
> not currently allow regulator child nodes, so add one.
>
> Each of these devices interacts with only a single regulator and
> documentation refers to it as "Vout", hence the choice of child node
> name.
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists