[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240224164558.02c08dd6@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 16:45:58 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Martin Sperl <kernel@...tin.sperl.org>,
David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>, Michael Hennerich
<michael.hennerich@...log.com>, Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@...s.st.com>, Maxime Coquelin
<mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Alexandre Torgue
<alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, Julien
Stephan <jstephan@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] spi: stm32: move splitting transfers to
optimize_message
On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:33:20 -0600
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com> wrote:
> Since splitting transfers was moved to spi_optimize_message() in the
> core SPI code, we now need to use the optimize_message callback in the
> STM32 SPI driver to ensure that the operation is only performed once
> when spi_optimize_message() is used by peripheral drivers explicitly.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Trivial comment inline. Otherwise LGTM
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
There are changes to when this happens wrt to locking but I think those
are all positive as the bus lock is held for less time and there
is nothing in here that needs that lock held.
> ---
>
> v2 changes: none
>
> drivers/spi/spi-stm32.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-stm32.c b/drivers/spi/spi-stm32.c
> index c32e57bb38bd..e4e7ddb7524a 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-stm32.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-stm32.c
> @@ -1118,6 +1118,21 @@ static irqreturn_t stm32h7_spi_irq_thread(int irq, void *dev_id)
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> +static int stm32_spi_optimize_message(struct spi_message *msg)
> +{
> + struct spi_controller *ctrl = msg->spi->controller;
> + struct stm32_spi *spi = spi_controller_get_devdata(ctrl);
> +
> + /* On STM32H7, messages should not exceed a maximum size set
If you spin a v3, this isn't in keeping with local comment style.
/*
* On...
> + * later via the set_number_of_data function. In order to
> + * ensure that, split large messages into several messages
> + */
> + if (spi->cfg->set_number_of_data)
> + return spi_split_transfers_maxwords(ctrl, msg, spi->t_size_max);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * stm32_spi_prepare_msg - set up the controller to transfer a single message
> * @ctrl: controller interface
> @@ -1163,18 +1178,6 @@ static int stm32_spi_prepare_msg(struct spi_controller *ctrl,
> !!(spi_dev->mode & SPI_LSB_FIRST),
> !!(spi_dev->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH));
>
> - /* On STM32H7, messages should not exceed a maximum size setted
> - * afterward via the set_number_of_data function. In order to
> - * ensure that, split large messages into several messages
> - */
> - if (spi->cfg->set_number_of_data) {
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = spi_split_transfers_maxwords(ctrl, msg, spi->t_size_max);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> spin_lock_irqsave(&spi->lock, flags);
>
> /* CPOL, CPHA and LSB FIRST bits have common register */
> @@ -2180,6 +2183,7 @@ static int stm32_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ctrl->max_speed_hz = spi->clk_rate / spi->cfg->baud_rate_div_min;
> ctrl->min_speed_hz = spi->clk_rate / spi->cfg->baud_rate_div_max;
> ctrl->use_gpio_descriptors = true;
> + ctrl->optimize_message = stm32_spi_optimize_message;
> ctrl->prepare_message = stm32_spi_prepare_msg;
> ctrl->transfer_one = stm32_spi_transfer_one;
> ctrl->unprepare_message = stm32_spi_unprepare_msg;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists