[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240224-smudgy-eldercare-d5d8640d9961@spud>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 19:20:30 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Alex Soo <yuklin.soo@...rfivetech.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Hal Feng <hal.feng@...rfivetech.com>,
Ley Foon Tan <leyfoon.tan@...rfivetech.com>,
Jianlong Huang <jianlong.huang@...rfivetech.com>,
Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: starfive: Add JH8100
pinctrl
On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 09:46:53AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > I would like a solution though. The only idea I have is passing
> > SystemReady cert, but that's an Arm thing.
I don't know jack about SystemReady - I had it in my head that it was a
system level certification. I am wondering how you think that
SystemReady certification would apply to a whole binding (I can see it
being a per-compatible thing, but that would be a mess I am sure).
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists