linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 12/39] dt-bindings: serial: atmel,at91-usart: add compatible for sam9x7.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240224-kimono-stress-898eae80abd3@spud>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 20:02:26 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>
Cc: radu_nicolae.pirea@....ro, richard.genoud@...il.com,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
	robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
	conor+dt@...nel.org, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com,
	alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, claudiu.beznea@...on.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/39] dt-bindings: serial: atmel,at91-usart: add
 compatible for sam9x7.

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 10:55:59PM +0530, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
> Add sam9x7 compatible to DT bindings documentation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Fixed the wrong addition of compatible
> - Added further compatibles that are possible correct (as per DT)
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml | 12 +++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
> index 65cb2e5c5eee..30af537e8e81 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
> @@ -23,11 +23,17 @@ properties:
>            - const: atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu
>            - const: atmel,at91sam9260-usart
>        - items:
> -          - const: microchip,sam9x60-usart
> +          - enum:
> +              - microchip,sam9x60-usart
> +              - microchip,sam9x7-usart
>            - const: atmel,at91sam9260-usart
>        - items:
> -          - const: microchip,sam9x60-dbgu
> -          - const: microchip,sam9x60-usart
> +          - enum:
> +              - microchip,sam9x60-dbgu
> +              - microchip,sam9x7-dbgu

> +          - enum:
> +              - microchip,sam9x60-usart
> +              - microchip,sam9x7-usart

This doesn't make sense - this enum should be a const.
I don't really understand the idea behind of the original binding here that
allowed:
"microchip,sam9x60-dbgu", "microchip,sam9x60-usart", "atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu", "atmel,at91sam9260-usart"

Specifically, I don't get the purpose of the "microchip,sam9x60-usart".
Either make it
      - items:
          - enum:
              - microchip,sam9x60-dbgu
              - microchip,sam9x7-dbgu
          - const: microchip,sam9x60-usart
          - const: atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu
          - const: atmel,at91sam9260-usart
or add
      - items:
          - const: microchip,sam9x60-dbgu
          - const: atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu
          - const: atmel,at91sam9260-usart
or explain exactly why this needs to be
"chipa-dgbu", "chipa-usart", "chipb-dbgu", "chipb-dbgu"

Thanks,
Conor.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)