[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <170887745713.215710.13782897214681477333.b4-ty@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 17:10:57 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 05/15] clk: samsung: Use single CPU clock
notifier callback for all chips
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 14:20:43 -0600, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> Reduce the code duplication by making all chips use a single version of
> exynos_cpuclk_notifier_cb() function. That will prevent the code bloat
> when adding new chips support too.
>
> Also don't pass base address to pre/post rate change functions, as it
> can be easily derived from already passed cpuclk param.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[05/15] clk: samsung: Use single CPU clock notifier callback for all chips
https://git.kernel.org/krzk/linux/c/c9bc1f778625b0ae93641e6d14d83b62d16e549d
Best regards,
--
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists