linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: ftrace: Don't forbid CALL_OPS+CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 12:54:39 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Jason Ling <jasonling@...omium.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: ftrace: Don't forbid
 CALL_OPS+CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE with Clang

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 10:40:29PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Per commit b3f11af9b2ce ("arm64: ftrace: forbid CALL_OPS with
> CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE"), GCC is silently ignoring `-falign-functions=N`
> when passed `-Os`, causing functions to be improperly aligned. This
> doesn't seem to be a problem with Clang though, where enabling CALL_OPS
> with CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE doesn't spit out any warnings at boot about
> misaligned patch-sites. Only forbid CALL_OPS if GCC is used and we're
> optimizing for size so that CALL_OPS can be used with clang optimizing
> for size.
> 
> Cc: Jason Ling <jasonling@...omium.org>
> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>
> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
> Cc: <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>
> Fixes: b3f11af9b2ce ("arm64: ftrace: forbid CALL_OPS with CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE")
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>

Seems reasonable to me.

Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>

I wonder if that GCC issue is resolved with '-fmin-function-alignment'
that is being introduced in GCC 14 [1]. If it is, I suspect this
conditional could actually be CONFIG_CC_HAS_SANE_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT
instead of CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG, but that can obviously happen as a clean
up later down the road (more just food for thought for the arm64 folks,
not sure how much '-Os' is used in general)

[1]: https://git.kernel.org/masahiroy/linux-kbuild/c/5270316c9fec8cc99aa0e0a258509c5c7f789d12


> ---
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index aa7c1d435139..6b96d75a3a3d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ config ARM64
>  		if DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS && DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_CALL_OPS
>  	select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_CALL_OPS \
>  		if (DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS && !CFI_CLANG && \
> -		    !CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE)
> +		    (CC_IS_CLANG || !CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE))
>  	select FTRACE_MCOUNT_USE_PATCHABLE_FUNCTION_ENTRY \
>  		if DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
>  	select HAVE_SAMPLE_FTRACE_DIRECT
> 
> base-commit: 6613476e225e090cc9aad49be7fa504e290dd33d
> -- 
> https://chromeos.dev
>