[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240225232541.17659-2-thorsten.blum@toblux.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 00:25:42 +0100
From: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...lux.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...lux.com>
Subject: [PATCH] time: Use div64_long() instead of do_div()
Fixes Coccinelle/coccicheck warning reported by do_div.cocci.
Compared to do_div(), div64_long() does not implicitly cast the divisor and
does not unnecessarily calculate the remainder.
Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...lux.com>
---
kernel/time/jiffies.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/jiffies.c b/kernel/time/jiffies.c
index bc4db9e5ab70..9d23178e2b6a 100644
--- a/kernel/time/jiffies.c
+++ b/kernel/time/jiffies.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int register_refined_jiffies(long cycles_per_second)
/* shift_hz stores hz<<8 for extra accuracy */
shift_hz = (u64)cycles_per_second << 8;
shift_hz += cycles_per_tick/2;
- do_div(shift_hz, cycles_per_tick);
+ shift_hz = div64_long(shift_hz, cycles_per_tick);
/* Calculate nsec_per_tick using shift_hz */
nsec_per_tick = (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC << 8;
nsec_per_tick += (u32)shift_hz/2;
--
2.43.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists