[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <318be511-06de-423e-8216-af869f27f849@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 13:04:11 +0000
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
To: Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: 21cnbao@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, mhocko@...e.com,
minchan@...nel.org, peterx@...hat.com, shy828301@...il.com,
songmuchun@...edance.com, wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, zokeefe@...gle.com,
fengwei.yin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/madvise: enhance lazyfreeing with mTHP in
madvise_free
On 26/02/2024 08:55, Lance Yang wrote:
> Hey David,
>
> Thanks for your suggestion!
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 4:41 PM David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
> [...]
>>> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 12:00 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 1:33 AM Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com> wrote:
>>> [...]
> [...]
>>> +static inline bool pte_range_cont_mapped(pte_t *pte, unsigned long nr)
>>> +{
>>> + pte_t pte_val;
>>> + unsigned long pfn = pte_pfn(pte);
>>> + for (int i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
>>> + pte_val = ptep_get(pte + i);
>>> + if (pte_none(pte_val) || pte_pfn(pte_val) != (pfn + i))
>>> + return false;
>>> + }
>>> + return true;
>>> +}
>>
>> I dislike the "cont mapped" terminology.
>>
>> Maybe folio_pte_batch() does what you want?
>
> folio_pte_batch() is a good choice. Appreciate it!
Agreed, folio_pte_batch() is likely to be widely useful for this change and
others, so suggest exporting it from memory.c and reusing as is if possible.
>
> Best,
> Lance
>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>>
>> David / dhildenb
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists