[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cb74a9f9-abfa-4a94-b4a9-bf41ddc697eb@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 13:40:00 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
Cc: Apurva Nandan <a-nandan@...com>,
Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>, Nishanth <nm@...com>,
Vignesh <vigneshr@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] spi: cadence-qspi: Fix runtime PM and system-wide
suspend
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 01:27:57PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 05:48:03PM +0530, Dhruva Gole wrote:
> > On Feb 22, 2024 at 19:13:29 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> [ 1.709414] Call trace:
> [ 1.711852] __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x84/0x540
> [ 1.716460] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x14/0x20
> [ 1.720719] mutex_lock+0x48/0x54
> [ 1.724026] spi_controller_suspend+0x30/0x7c
> [ 1.728377] cqspi_suspend+0x1c/0x6c
> [ 1.731944] pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x2c/0x44
> [ 1.736640] genpd_runtime_suspend+0xa8/0x254
> (it's generally helpful to provide the most relevant section directly.)
> The issue here appears to be that we've registered for runtime suspend
> prior to registering the controller...
Actually, no - after this series cqspi_suspend() is the system not
runtime PM operation and should not be called from runtime suspend. How
is that happening?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists