[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zdy0CGL6e0ri8LiC@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 07:53:44 -0800
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: John Groves <John@...ves.net>
Cc: John Groves <jgroves@...ron.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
john@...alactic.com, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
gregory.price@...verge.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/20] Introduce the famfs shared-memory file system
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 07:27:18AM -0600, John Groves wrote:
> Run status group 0 (all jobs):
> WRITE: bw=29.6GiB/s (31.8GB/s), 29.6GiB/s-29.6GiB/s (31.8GB/s-31.8GB/s), io=44.7GiB (48.0GB), run=1511-1511msec
> This is run on an xfs file system on a SATA ssd.
To compare more closer apples to apples, wouldn't it make more sense
to try this with XFS on pmem (with fio -direct=1)?
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists