linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] platform/mellanox: mlxbf-pmc: Fix module loading

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:04:55 +0200 (EET)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@...hat.com>
cc: shravankr@...dia.com, davthompson@...dia.com, ndalvi@...hat.com, 
    LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, 
    Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] platform/mellanox: mlxbf-pmc: Fix module loading

On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, Luiz Capitulino wrote:

> On 2024-02-26 08:27, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:57:28 -0500, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > 
> > > The mlxbf-pmc driver fails to load when the firmware reports a new but not
> > > yet implemented performance block. I can reproduce this today with a
> > > Bluefield-3 card and UEFI version 4.6.0-18-g7d063bb-BId13035, since this
> > > reports the new clock_measure performance block.
> > > 
> > > This[1] patch from Shravan implements the clock_measure support and will
> > > solve the issue. But this series avoids the situation by ignoring and
> > > logging unsupported performance blocks.
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > 
> > 
> > Thank you for your contribution, it has been applied to my local
> > review-ilpo branch. Note it will show up in the public
> > platform-drivers-x86/review-ilpo branch only once I've pushed my
> > local branch there, which might take a while.
> 
> Thank you Ilpo and thanks Hans for the review.
> 
> The only detail is that we probably want this merged for 6.8 since
> the driver doesn't currently load with the configuration mentioned above.

Oh, sorry, I missed the mention in the coverletter.

So you'd want I drop these from review-ilpo branch as there they end
up into for-next branch, and they should go through Hans instead who 
handles fixes branch for this cycle?

-- 
 i.