linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] spi: spi-mem: add statistics support to ->exec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:42:22 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>, Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>, 
 Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>, 
 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, 
 Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: spi-mem: add statistics support to ->exec_op()
 calls

On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 17:42:19 +0100, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> Current behavior is that spi-mem operations do not increment statistics,
> neither per-controller nor per-device, if ->exec_op() is used. For
> operations that do NOT use ->exec_op(), stats are increased as the
> usual spi_sync() is called.
> 
> The newly implemented spi_mem_add_op_stats() function is strongly
> inspired by spi_statistics_add_transfer_stats(); locking logic and
> l2len computation comes from there.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: spi-mem: add statistics support to ->exec_op() calls
      commit: e63aef9c9121e5061cbf5112d12cadc9da399692

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark