Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 11:06:48 -0600
From: Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao@....com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
 Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
 Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt
 <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
 Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>, Andrew Jones
 <andrew.jones@...ux.dev>, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
 Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
 Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@...itsu.com>,
 "Giani, Dhaval" <dhaval.giani@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/11] KVM: selftests: Add SEV and SEV-ES smoke tests

Hello,

On 2/22/24 18:42, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Add basic SEV and SEV-ES smoke tests.  Unlike the intra-host migration tests,
> this one actually runs a small chunk of code in the guest.
> 
> Unless anyone strongly objects to the quick and dirty approach I've taken for
> SEV-ES, I'll get all of this queued for 6.9 soon-ish.
> 
> As for _why_ I added the quick-and-dirty SEV-ES testcase, I have a series to
> cleanup __svm_sev_es_vcpu_run(), and found out that apparently I have a version
> of OVMF that doesn't quite have to the right <something> for SEV-ES, and so I
> could even get a "real" VM to reach KVM_RUN.  I assumed (correctly, yay!) that
> hacking together a selftest would be faster than figuring out what firmware
> magic I am missing.

Tested-by: Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao@....com>

> 
> v9:
>   - Drop is_kvm_sev_supported() and rely purely on KVM capabilities.
>   - Check X86_FEATURE_SEV to ensure SEV is actually enabled.
>   - Collect tags. [Carlos, Itaru]
> 
> v8:
>   - https://lore.kernel.org/all/cc9a1951-e76c-470d-a4d1-8ad67bae5794@amd.com
>   - Undo the kvm.h uAPI breakage.
>   - Take advantage of "struct vm_shape", introduced by the guest_memfd
>     selftests, to simply tracking the SEV/SEV-ES subtypes.
>   - Rename the test to "sev_smoke_test" instead of "sev_all_boot_test",
>     as the "all" is rather nonsensical, and the test isn't booting anything
>     in the traditional sense of the word.
>   - Drop vm->protected and instead add an arch hook to query if the VM has
>     protected memory.
>   - Assert that the target memory region supports protected memory when
>     allocating protected memory.
>   - Allocate protected_phy_pages for memory regions if and only if the VM
>     supports protected memory.
>   - Rename kvm_host.h to kvm_util_arch.h, and move it to selftests/kvm where
>     it belongs.
>   - Fix up some SoB goofs.
>   - Convert the intrahost SEV/SEV-ES migration tests to use common ioctl()
>     wrappers.
> 
> Ackerley Tng (1):
>    KVM: selftests: Add a macro to iterate over a sparsebit range
> 
> Michael Roth (2):
>    KVM: selftests: Make sparsebit structs const where appropriate
>    KVM: selftests: Add support for protected vm_vaddr_* allocations
> 
> Peter Gonda (5):
>    KVM: selftests: Add support for allocating/managing protected guest
>      memory
>    KVM: selftests: Explicitly ucall pool from shared memory
>    KVM: selftests: Allow tagging protected memory in guest page tables
>    KVM: selftests: Add library for creating and interacting with SEV
>      guests
>    KVM: selftests: Add a basic SEV smoke test
> 
> Sean Christopherson (3):
>    KVM: selftests: Extend VM creation's @shape to allow control of VM
>      subtype
>    KVM: selftests: Use the SEV library APIs in the intra-host migration
>      test
>    KVM: selftests: Add a basic SEV-ES smoke test
> 
>   tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile          |   2 +
>   .../kvm/include/aarch64/kvm_util_arch.h       |   7 ++
>   .../selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h     |  50 +++++++-
>   .../kvm/include/riscv/kvm_util_arch.h         |   7 ++
>   .../kvm/include/s390x/kvm_util_arch.h         |   7 ++
>   .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/sparsebit.h |  56 ++++++---
>   .../kvm/include/x86_64/kvm_util_arch.h        |  23 ++++
>   .../selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h  |   8 ++
>   .../selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/sev.h        | 107 ++++++++++++++++
>   tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c    |  67 ++++++++--
>   tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/sparsebit.c   |  48 ++++----
>   .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/ucall_common.c  |   3 +-
>   .../selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c      |  32 ++++-
>   tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/sev.c  | 114 ++++++++++++++++++
>   .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/sev_migrate_tests.c  |  67 ++++------
>   .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/sev_smoke_test.c     |  88 ++++++++++++++
>   16 files changed, 583 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/kvm_util_arch.h
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/kvm_util_arch.h
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390x/kvm_util_arch.h
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/kvm_util_arch.h
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/sev.h
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/sev.c
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sev_smoke_test.c
> 
> 
> base-commit: 60eedcfceda9db46f1b333e5e1aa9359793f04fb

Thanks,
Carlos

Powered by blists - more mailing lists