[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zd0VBo3ilwRq4BJy@google.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 14:47:34 -0800
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 5/5] f2fs: allow to mount if cap is 100
On 02/26, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:56 PM Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Don't block mounting the partition, if cap is 100%.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > index 6d586ae8b55f..f11361152d2a 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > @@ -904,6 +904,9 @@ int f2fs_disable_cp_again(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t unusable)
> > {
> > int ovp_hole_segs =
> > (overprovision_segments(sbi) - reserved_segments(sbi));
> > +
> > + if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).unusable_cap_perc == 100)
> > + return 0;
>
> With this, f2fs will not execute GC. What is this 100
> unusable_cap_perc used for?
Theoritically, it won't, but I was hitting a GC loop, and I suspected a wrong
section/segment layout. So, I posted the below, and guess we need this patch
as workaround.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/f2fs/patch/20240224011411.3820719-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org/
>
> > if (unusable > F2FS_OPTION(sbi).unusable_cap)
> > return -EAGAIN;
> > if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED_QUICK) &&
> > --
> > 2.44.0.rc0.258.g7320e95886-goog
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > Linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists