[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <6dd201694cf2ce7f866e0634c3113db7a9024f8b.1708933498.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 00:26:03 -0800
From: isaku.yamahata@...el.com
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: isaku.yamahata@...el.com,
isaku.yamahata@...il.com,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
erdemaktas@...gle.com,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
chen.bo@...el.com,
hang.yuan@...el.com,
tina.zhang@...el.com,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v19 061/130] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Sprinkle __must_check
From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
TDP MMU allows tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic() and tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic() to
return -EBUSY or -EAGAIN error. The caller must check the return value and
retry. Sprinkle __must_check to guarantee it.
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
--
v19:
- Added Reviewed-by: Binbin
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 10507920f36b..a90907b31c54 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -507,9 +507,9 @@ static void handle_changed_spte(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t gfn,
* no side-effects other than setting iter->old_spte to the last
* known value of the spte.
*/
-static inline int tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
- struct tdp_iter *iter,
- u64 new_spte)
+static inline int __must_check tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct tdp_iter *iter,
+ u64 new_spte)
{
u64 *sptep = rcu_dereference(iter->sptep);
@@ -539,8 +539,8 @@ static inline int tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
return 0;
}
-static inline int tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
- struct tdp_iter *iter)
+static inline int __must_check tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct tdp_iter *iter)
{
int ret;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists