linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/madvise: enhance lazyfreeing with mTHP in madvise

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240226083526.26002-1-ioworker0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:35:26 +0800
From: Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com>
To: fengwei.yin@...el.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	david@...hat.com,
	ioworker0@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	mhocko@...e.com,
	minchan@...nel.org,
	peterx@...hat.com,
	ryan.roberts@....com,
	shy828301@...il.com,
	songmuchun@...edance.com,
	wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com,
	zokeefe@...gle.com,
	21cnbao@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/madvise: enhance lazyfreeing with mTHP in madvise_free

Hey Fengwei,

Thanks for taking time to review!

> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:38 AM Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@...el.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 8:32 PM Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com> wrote:
[...]
> > --- a/mm/madvise.c
> > +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> > @@ -676,11 +676,43 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
> >                */
> >               if (folio_test_large(folio)) {
> >                       int err;
> > +                     unsigned long next_addr, align;
> >
> > -                     if (folio_estimated_sharers(folio) != 1)
> > -                             break;
> > -                     if (!folio_trylock(folio))
> > -                             break;
> > +                     if (folio_estimated_sharers(folio) != 1 ||
> > +                         !folio_trylock(folio))
> > +                             goto skip_large_folio;
> > +
> > +                     align = folio_nr_pages(folio) * PAGE_SIZE;
> > +                     next_addr = ALIGN_DOWN(addr + align, align);
> There is a possible corner case:
> If there is a cow folio associated with this folio and the cow folio
> has smaller size than this folio for whatever reason, this change can't
> handle it correctly.

Thanks for pointing that out; it's very helpful to me!
I made some changes. Could you please check if this corner case is now resolved?

As a diff against this patch.

diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
index bcbf56595a2e..c7aacc9f9536 100644
--- a/mm/madvise.c
+++ b/mm/madvise.c
@@ -686,10 +686,12 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
 			next_addr = ALIGN_DOWN(addr + align, align);
 
 			/*
-			 * If we mark only the subpages as lazyfree,
-			 * split the large folio.
+			 * If we mark only the subpages as lazyfree, or
+			 * if there is a cow folio associated with this folio,
+			 * then split the large folio.
 			 */
-			if (next_addr > end || next_addr - addr != align)
+			if (next_addr > end || next_addr - addr != align ||
+			    folio_total_mapcount(folio) != folio_nr_pages(folio))
 				goto split_large_folio;
 
 			/*
---

Thanks again for your time!

Best,
Lance