linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] net: stmmac: fix rx queue priority assignment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 10:31:44 +0100
From: Piotr Wejman <piotrwejman90@...il.com>
To: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
	Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Piotr Wejman <piotrwejman90@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] net: stmmac: fix rx queue priority assignment

The driver should ensure that same priority is not mapped to multiple
rx queues. Currently rx_queue_priority() function is adding
priorities for a queue without clearing them from others.

>From DesignWare Cores Ethernet Quality-of-Service
Databook, section 17.1.29 MAC_RxQ_Ctrl2:
"[...]The software must ensure that the content of this field is
mutually exclusive to the PSRQ fields for other queues, that is,
the same priority is not mapped to multiple Rx queues[...]"

After this patch, rx_queue_priority() function will:
- assign desired priorities to a queue
- remove those priorities from all other queues
The write sequence of CTRL2 and CTRL3 registers is done in the way to
ensure this order.

Signed-off-by: Piotr Wejman <piotrwejman90@...il.com>
---
Changes in v2:
  - Add some comments
  - Apply same changes to dwxgmac2_rx_queue_prio()
  - Revert "Rename prio argument to prio_mask"
  - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240219102405.32015-1-piotrwejman90@gmail.com/T/#u

 .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c | 42 +++++++++++++++----
 .../ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c   | 40 ++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c
index 6b6d0de09619..76ec0c1da250 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c
@@ -92,19 +92,43 @@ static void dwmac4_rx_queue_priority(struct mac_device_info *hw,
 				     u32 prio, u32 queue)
 {
 	void __iomem *ioaddr = hw->pcsr;
-	u32 base_register;
-	u32 value;
+	u32 clear_mask = 0;
+	u32 ctrl2, ctrl3;
+	int i;
 
-	base_register = (queue < 4) ? GMAC_RXQ_CTRL2 : GMAC_RXQ_CTRL3;
-	if (queue >= 4)
-		queue -= 4;
+	ctrl2 = readl(ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL2);
+	ctrl3 = readl(ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL3);
+	
+	/* The software must ensure that the same priority
+	 * is not mapped to multiple Rx queues.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
+		clear_mask |= ((prio << GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_SHIFT(i)) &
+						GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_MASK(i));
 
-	value = readl(ioaddr + base_register);
+	ctrl2 &= ~clear_mask;
+	ctrl3 &= ~clear_mask;
 
-	value &= ~GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_MASK(queue);
-	value |= (prio << GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_SHIFT(queue)) &
+	/* Assign new priorities to a queue and
+	 * clear them from others queues.
+	 * The CTRL2 and CTRL3 registers write sequence is done
+	 * in the way to ensure this order.
+	 */
+	if (queue < 4) {
+		ctrl2 |= (prio << GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_SHIFT(queue)) &
 						GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_MASK(queue);
-	writel(value, ioaddr + base_register);
+
+		writel(ctrl2, ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL2);
+		writel(ctrl3, ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL3);
+	} else {
+		queue -= 4;
+
+		ctrl3 |= (prio << GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_SHIFT(queue)) &
+						GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_MASK(queue);
+
+		writel(ctrl3, ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL3);
+		writel(ctrl2, ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL2);
+	}
 }
 
 static void dwmac4_tx_queue_priority(struct mac_device_info *hw,
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c
index 1af2f89a0504..7ad73e1d353e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c
@@ -105,17 +105,43 @@ static void dwxgmac2_rx_queue_prio(struct mac_device_info *hw, u32 prio,
 				   u32 queue)
 {
 	void __iomem *ioaddr = hw->pcsr;
-	u32 value, reg;
+	u32 clear_mask = 0;
+	u32 ctrl2, ctrl3;
+	int i;
 
-	reg = (queue < 4) ? XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL2 : XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL3;
-	if (queue >= 4)
+	ctrl2 = readl(ioaddr + XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL2);
+	ctrl3 = readl(ioaddr + XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL3);
+	
+	/* The software must ensure that the same priority
+	 * is not mapped to multiple Rx queues.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
+		clear_mask |= ((prio << XGMAC_PSRQ_SHIFT(i)) &
+						XGMAC_PSRQ(i));
+
+	ctrl2 &= ~clear_mask;
+	ctrl3 &= ~clear_mask;
+
+	/* Assign new priorities to a queue and
+	 * clear them from others queues.
+	 * The CTRL2 and CTRL3 registers write sequence is done
+	 * in the way to ensure this order.
+	 */
+	if (queue < 4) {
+		ctrl2 |= (prio << XGMAC_PSRQ_SHIFT(queue)) &
+						XGMAC_PSRQ(queue);
+
+		writel(ctrl2, ioaddr + XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL2);
+		writel(ctrl3, ioaddr + XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL3);
+	} else {
 		queue -= 4;
 
-	value = readl(ioaddr + reg);
-	value &= ~XGMAC_PSRQ(queue);
-	value |= (prio << XGMAC_PSRQ_SHIFT(queue)) & XGMAC_PSRQ(queue);
+		ctrl3 |= (prio << XGMAC_PSRQ_SHIFT(queue)) &
+						XGMAC_PSRQ(queue);
 
-	writel(value, ioaddr + reg);
+		writel(ctrl3, ioaddr + XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL3);
+		writel(ctrl2, ioaddr + XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL2);
+	}
 }
 
 static void dwxgmac2_tx_queue_prio(struct mac_device_info *hw, u32 prio,
-- 
2.25.1