linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainer for NXP S32G boards

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f988dffa-dd5c-48a5-9ebb-e13f9443989f@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 10:55:02 +0100
From: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Chester Lin <chester62515@...il.com>,
 Shawn Guo <shawnguo2@...h.net>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 Ghennadi Procopciuc <ghennadi.procopciuc@....nxp.com>,
 Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
 Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
 Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, soc@...nel.org,
 NXP S32 Linux Team <s32@....com>,
 Ghennadi Procopciuc <ghennadi.procopciuc@....com>,
 Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
 Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
 NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainer for NXP S32G boards



On 24/02/2024 12:42, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
[...]
>>> ARM/NXP S32G ARCHITECTURE
>>> M:      Chester Lin <chester62515@...il.com>
>>> R:      Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
>>> R:      Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>
>>> R:      NXP S32 Linux Team <s32@....com>
>>> L:      linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
>>> S:      Maintained
>>> F:      arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/s32g*.dts*
>>>
>>> However I'm fine with collecting and sending patches through IMX tree,
>>> if S32G folks help review them.
>>>
>>
>> This looks good to me as well.
> 
> Ok, in this case I would suggest we change this section to
> only have 'R:' entries and no 'M:' for the moment.
> 
> Between the four of you (Chester, Andreas, Matthias, Ghennadi),
> I think we can choose to keep everyone or drop those that are
> unlikely to actually review patches. Please let us know you
> would like to be included as a reviewer or not.
> 

Please include me as reviewer :)

Regards,
Matthias