linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the gpio-brgl tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 11:02:39 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, 
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the gpio-brgl tree

On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 7:41 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.orgau> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> The following commit is also in the mfd tree as A different commit
> (but the same patch):
>
>   4a7b0850fc7a ("dt-bindings: cros-ec: Add properties for GPIO controller")
>
> This is commit
>
>   7b79740d42e7 ("dt-bindings: mfd: cros-ec: Add properties for GPIO controller")
>
> in the mfd tree.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell

Hi Stephen, Lee!

I picked it up because I was already queuing the patch adding the GPIO
driver. Unless there are conflicts with the MFD branch (doesn't seem
like it?), I think it should go through the GPIO branch together with
the driver.

Bart