linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] fuse: use GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT for allocations in fuse_dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJfpegsttFdeZnahAFQS=jG_uaw6XMHFfw7WKgAhujLaNszcsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 12:01:07 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com>
Cc: mszeredi@...hat.com, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] fuse: use GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT for allocations in fuse_dev_alloc

On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 16:21, Alexander Mikhalitsyn
<aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> fuse_dev_alloc() is called from the process context and it makes
> sense to properly account allocated memory to the kmemcg as these
> allocations are for long living objects.

Are the rules about when to use __GFP_ACCOUNT and when not documented somewhere?

I notice that most filesystem objects are allocated with
__GFP_ACCOUNT, but struct super_block isn't.  Is there a reason for
that?

Thanks,
Miklos