[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240226133646.174d3fb2.pekka.paalanen@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 13:36:46 +0200
From: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@...labora.com>
To: Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet@...tlin.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@...il.com>, Melissa Wen
<melissa.srw@...il.com>, MaĆra Canal
<mairacanal@...eup.net>, Haneen Mohammed <hamohammed.sa@...il.com>, Daniel
Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Maarten Lankhorst
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
arthurgrillo@...eup.net, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jeremie.dautheribes@...tlin.com, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] drm/vkms: Add typedef and documentation for
pixel_read and pixel_write functions
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:37:24 +0100
Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet@...tlin.com> wrote:
> Introduce two typedefs: pixel_read_t and pixel_write_t. It allows the
> compiler to check if the passed functions take the correct arguments.
> Such typedefs will help ensuring consistency across the code base in
> case of update of these prototypes.
>
> Introduce a check around the get_pixel_*_functions to avoid using a
> nullptr as a function.
>
> Document for those typedefs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet@...tlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_formats.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_formats.h | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c | 9 ++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_writeback.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 5 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.h
> index 18086423a3a7..886c885c8cf5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.h
> @@ -53,12 +53,31 @@ struct line_buffer {
> struct pixel_argb_u16 *pixels;
> };
>
> +/**
> + * typedef pixel_write_t - These functions are used to read a pixel from a
> + * `struct pixel_argb_u16*`, convert it in a specific format and write it in the @dst_pixels
> + * buffer.
> + *
> + * @dst_pixel: destination address to write the pixel
> + * @in_pixel: pixel to write
> + */
> +typedef void (*pixel_write_t)(u8 *dst_pixels, struct pixel_argb_u16 *in_pixel);
There are some inconsistencies in pixel_write_t and pixel_read_t. At
this point of the series they still operate on a single pixel, but you
use dst_pixels and src_pixels, plural. Yet the documentation correctly
talks about processing a single pixel.
I would also expect the source to be always const, but that's a whole
another patch to change.
> +
> struct vkms_writeback_job {
> struct iosys_map data[DRM_FORMAT_MAX_PLANES];
> struct vkms_frame_info wb_frame_info;
> - void (*pixel_write)(u8 *dst_pixels, struct pixel_argb_u16 *in_pixel);
> + pixel_write_t pixel_write;
> };
>
> +/**
> + * typedef pixel_read_t - These functions are used to read a pixel in the source frame,
> + * convert it to `struct pixel_argb_u16` and write it to @out_pixel.
> + *
> + * @src_pixels: Pointer to the pixel to read
> + * @out_pixel: Pointer to write the converted pixel
> + */
> +typedef void (*pixel_read_t)(u8 *src_pixels, struct pixel_argb_u16 *out_pixel);
> +
> /**
> * vkms_plane_state - Driver specific plane state
> * @base: base plane state
> @@ -69,7 +88,7 @@ struct vkms_writeback_job {
> struct vkms_plane_state {
> struct drm_shadow_plane_state base;
> struct vkms_frame_info *frame_info;
> - void (*pixel_read)(u8 *src_buffer, struct pixel_argb_u16 *out_pixel);
> + pixel_read_t pixel_read;
> };
>
> struct vkms_plane {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_formats.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_formats.c
> index cb7a49b7c8e7..1f5aeba57ad6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_formats.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_formats.c
> @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ void vkms_writeback_row(struct vkms_writeback_job *wb,
> *
> * @format: 4cc of the format
> */
> -void *get_pixel_conversion_function(u32 format)
> +pixel_read_t get_pixel_read_function(u32 format)
> {
> switch (format) {
> case DRM_FORMAT_ARGB8888:
> @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ void *get_pixel_conversion_function(u32 format)
> case DRM_FORMAT_RGB565:
> return &RGB565_to_argb_u16;
> default:
> - return NULL;
> + return (pixel_read_t)NULL;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ void *get_pixel_conversion_function(u32 format)
> *
> * @format: 4cc of the format
> */
> -void *get_pixel_write_function(u32 format)
> +pixel_write_t get_pixel_write_function(u32 format)
> {
> switch (format) {
> case DRM_FORMAT_ARGB8888:
> @@ -301,6 +301,6 @@ void *get_pixel_write_function(u32 format)
> case DRM_FORMAT_RGB565:
> return &argb_u16_to_RGB565;
> default:
> - return NULL;
> + return (pixel_write_t)NULL;
> }
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_formats.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_formats.h
> index cf59c2ed8e9a..3ecea4563254 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_formats.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_formats.h
> @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@
>
> #include "vkms_drv.h"
>
> -void *get_pixel_conversion_function(u32 format);
> +pixel_read_t get_pixel_read_function(u32 format);
>
> -void *get_pixel_write_function(u32 format);
> +pixel_write_t get_pixel_write_function(u32 format);
>
> #endif /* _VKMS_FORMATS_H_ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c
> index d5203f531d96..f68b1b03d632 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_plane.c
> @@ -106,6 +106,13 @@ static void vkms_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
> return;
>
> fmt = fb->format->format;
> + pixel_read_t pixel_read = get_pixel_read_function(fmt);
> +
> + if (!pixel_read) {
> + DRM_WARN("Pixel format is not supported by VKMS planes. State is inchanged\n");
DRM_WARN() is the kernel equivalent to userspace assert(), right?
In that failing the check means an internal invariant was violated,
which means a code bug in kernel?
Maybe this could be more specific about what invariant was violated?
E.g. atomic check should have rejected this attempt already.
Thanks,
pq
> + return;
> + }
> +
> vkms_plane_state = to_vkms_plane_state(new_state);
> shadow_plane_state = &vkms_plane_state->base;
>
> @@ -124,7 +131,7 @@ static void vkms_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
> drm_rect_rotate(&frame_info->rotated, drm_rect_width(&frame_info->rotated),
> drm_rect_height(&frame_info->rotated), frame_info->rotation);
>
> - vkms_plane_state->pixel_read = get_pixel_conversion_function(fmt);
> + vkms_plane_state->pixel_read = pixel_read;
> }
>
> static int vkms_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_writeback.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_writeback.c
> index c8582df1f739..c92b9f06c4a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_writeback.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_writeback.c
> @@ -140,6 +140,13 @@ static void vkms_wb_atomic_commit(struct drm_connector *conn,
> if (!conn_state)
> return;
>
> + pixel_write_t pixel_write = get_pixel_write_function(wb_format);
> +
> + if (!pixel_write) {
> + DRM_WARN("Pixel format is not supported by VKMS writeback. State is inchanged\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> vkms_set_composer(&vkmsdev->output, true);
>
> active_wb = conn_state->writeback_job->priv;
> @@ -150,7 +157,7 @@ static void vkms_wb_atomic_commit(struct drm_connector *conn,
> crtc_state->wb_pending = true;
> spin_unlock_irq(&output->composer_lock);
> drm_writeback_queue_job(wb_conn, connector_state);
> - active_wb->pixel_write = get_pixel_write_function(wb_format);
> + active_wb->pixel_write = pixel_write;
> drm_rect_init(&wb_frame_info->src, 0, 0, crtc_width, crtc_height);
> drm_rect_init(&wb_frame_info->dst, 0, 0, crtc_width, crtc_height);
> }
>
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists