[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a1ad9a5-52d8-4d78-9c26-ee5b9eb00b40@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 13:59:39 +0200
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] perf test: Fix spelling mistake "curent" ->
"current"
On 26/02/24 12:53, Colin Ian King wrote:
> There is a spelling mistake in a pr_debug message. Fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/symbols.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/symbols.c b/tools/perf/tests/symbols.c
> index 2fed6d67f50f..d208105919ed 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/symbols.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/symbols.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int create_map(struct test_info *ti, char *filename, struct map **map_p)
> *map_p = find_module_map(ti->machine, dso);
> dso__put(dso);
> if (!*map_p) {
> - pr_debug("Failed to find map for curent kernel module %s",
> + pr_debug("Failed to find map for current kernel module %s",
> filename);
> return TEST_FAIL;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists