| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ECEF5EF8-3328-43AD-9E0B-7AE325368CB7@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:20:40 -0500
From: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@...cinc.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz, dhowells@...hat.com,
surenb@...gle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"\"# see patch description\"" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/huge_memory: fix swap entry values of tail pages of
THP
On 27 Feb 2024, at 10:01, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 27.02.24 15:52, Zi Yan wrote:
>> On 27 Feb 2024, at 9:11, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>
>>> On 14.02.24 15:34, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>> On 14.02.24 15:18, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 12:04:10PM +0530, Charan Teja Kalla wrote:
>>>>>>> 1) Is it broken in 5.15? Did you actually try to reproduce or is this
>>>>>>> just a guess?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We didn't run the tests with THP enabled on 5.15, __so we didn't
>>>>>> encounter this issue__ on older to 6.1 kernels.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I mentioned that issue exists is based on my understanding after code
>>>>>> walk through. To be specific, I just looked to the
>>>>>> migrate_pages()->..->migrate_page_move_mapping() &
>>>>>> __split_huge_page_tail() where the ->private field of thp sub-pages is
>>>>>> not filled with swap entry. If it could have set, I think these are the
>>>>>> only places where it would have done, per my understanding. CMIW.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think you have a misunderstanding. David's patch cfeed8ffe55b (part
>>>>> of 6.6) _stopped_ us using the tail ->private entries. So in 6.1, these
>>>>> tail pages should already have page->private set, and I don't understand
>>>>> what you're fixing.
>>>>
>>>> I think the issue is, that migrate_page_move_mapping() /
>>>> folio_migrate_mapping() would update ->private for a folio in the
>>>> swapcache (head page)
>>>>
>>>> newfolio->private = folio_get_private(folio);
>>>>
>>>> but not the ->private of the tail pages.
>>>>
>>>> So once you migrate a THP that is in the swapcache, ->private of the
>>>> tail pages would not be migrated and, therefore, be stale/wrong.
>>>>
>>>> Even before your patch that was the case.
>>>>
>>>> Looking at migrate_page_move_mapping(), we had:
>>>>
>>>> if (PageSwapBacked(page)) {
>>>> __SetPageSwapBacked(newpage);
>>>> if (PageSwapCache(page)) {
>>>> SetPageSwapCache(newpage);
>>>> set_page_private(newpage, page_private(page));
>>>> }
>>>> } else {
>>>> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageSwapCache(page), page);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't immediately see where the tail pages would similarly get updated
>>>> (via set_page_private).
>>>>
>>>> With my patch the problem is gone, because the tail page entries don't
>>>> have to be migrated, because they are unused.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Maybe this was an oversight from THP_SWAP -- 38d8b4e6bdc8 ("mm, THP,
>>>> swap: delay splitting THP during swap out").
>>>>
>>>> It did update __add_to_swap_cache():
>>>>
>>>> for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
>>>> set_page_private(page + i, entry.val + i);
>>>> error = radix_tree_insert(&address_space->page_tree,
>>>> idx + i, page + i);
>>>> if (unlikely(error))
>>>> break;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> and similarly __delete_from_swap_cache().
>>>>
>>>> But I don't see any updates to migration code.
>>>>
>>>> Now, it could be that THP migration was added later (post 2017), in that
>>>> case the introducing commit would not have been 38d8b4e6bdc8.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Let's continue:
>>>
>>> The introducing commit is likely either
>>>
>>> (1) 38d8b4e6bdc87 ("mm, THP, swap: delay splitting THP during swap out")
>>>
>>> That one added THP_SWAP, but THP migration wasn't supported yet AFAIKS.
>>>
>>> -> v4.13
>>>
>>> (2) 616b8371539a6 ("mm: thp: enable thp migration in generic path")
>>
>> I think this is the one, since it makes THP entering migrate_page_move_mapping()
>> possible.
>>
>>>
>>> Or likely any of the following that actually allocate THP for migration:
>>>
>>> 8135d8926c08e mm: memory_hotplug: memory hotremove supports thp migration
>>> e8db67eb0ded3 mm: migrate: move_pages() supports thp migration
>>> c8633798497ce mm: mempolicy: mbind and migrate_pages support thp migration
>>>
>>> That actually enable THP migration.
>>>
>>> -> v4.14
>>>
>>>
>>> So likely we'd have to fix the stable kernels:
>>>
>>> 4.19
>>> 5.4
>>> 5.10
>>> 5.15
>>> 6.1
>>>
>>> That's a lot of pre-folio code. A backport of my series likely won't really make any sense.
>>>
>>> Staring at 4.19.307 code base, we likely have to perform a stable-only fix that properly handles the swapcache of compoud pages in migrate_page_move_mapping().
>>
>> Something like (applies to v4.19.307):
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
>> index 171573613c39..59878459c28c 100644
>> --- a/mm/migrate.c
>> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
>> @@ -514,8 +514,13 @@ int migrate_page_move_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
>> if (PageSwapBacked(page)) {
>> __SetPageSwapBacked(newpage);
>> if (PageSwapCache(page)) {
>> + int i;
>> +
>> SetPageSwapCache(newpage);
>> - set_page_private(newpage, page_private(page));
>> + for (i = 0; i < (1 << compound_order(page)); i++) {
>> + set_page_private(newpage + i,
>> + page_private(page + i));
>> + }
>> }
>> } else {
>> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageSwapCache(page), page);
>
> I'm wondering if there is a swapcache update missing as well.
It seems that e71769ae5260 ("mm: enable thp migration for shmem thp") fixed
swapcache entry part, starting from v4.19.
--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (855 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists