linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 6/6] net: hisi_femac: remove unused compatible strings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <SEZPR06MB69590A200BDDD6D3DA4CD2DA96592@SEZPR06MB6959.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 09:51:26 +0800
From: Yang Xiwen <forbidden405@...look.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 Yisen Zhuang <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>, Salil Mehta
 <salil.mehta@...wei.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
 Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 6/6] net: hisi_femac: remove unused compatible
 strings

On 2/26/2024 3:55 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 22/02/2024 13:43, Yang Xiwen via B4 Relay wrote:
>> From: Yang Xiwen <forbidden405@...look.com>
>>
>> The only documented SoC Hi3516DV300 does not receive any updates from 8
>> years ago. With the recent driver changes, it unlikely works for this
>> SoC anymore. Remove the binding for this SoC.
>>
>> Also it's hard to get the version number and it's unknown how the
>> version can be used. Remove them until it's really needed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Xiwen <forbidden405@...look.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hisi_femac.c | 4 +---
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hisi_femac.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hisi_femac.c
>> index eab91e011d11..9466ca9da2bb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hisi_femac.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hisi_femac.c
>> @@ -990,9 +990,7 @@ static int hisi_femac_drv_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  #endif
>>  
>>  static const struct of_device_id hisi_femac_match[] = {
>> -	{.compatible = "hisilicon,hisi-femac-v1",},
>> -	{.compatible = "hisilicon,hisi-femac-v2",},
>> -	{.compatible = "hisilicon,hi3516cv300-femac",},
>> +	{.compatible = "hisilicon,hisi-femac",},
> 
> What is happening here? Removal could be justified, but then order of
> your patches is totally wrong. But that hisi-femac is a no-go or provide
> proper rationale.

I don't understand exactly... In dts, we commonly have a SoC specific
compatible string first, generic compatible string the second. e.g.

compatible = "hisilicon,hi3798mv200-perictrl", "syscon", "simple-mfd".

So i think this is recommended. Or does it mean we only need them in
dts, not in the driver? The generic driver only needs a generic
compatible "hisilicon,hisi-femac" in all?

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

-- 
Best regards,
Yang Xiwen