[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240227161548.2929881-1-arnd@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 17:15:39 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: kunit: use dynamic inode allocation
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Storing an inode structure on the stack pushes some functions over the warning
limit for stack frame size:
In file included from fs/ext4/mballoc.c:7039:
fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c:506:13: error: stack frame size (1032) exceeds limit (1024) in 'test_mark_diskspace_used' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
506 | static void test_mark_diskspace_used(struct kunit *test)
| ^
Use kunit_kzalloc() for all inodes. There may be a better way to do it by
preallocating the inode, which would result in a larger rework.
Fixes: 2b81493f8eb6 ("ext4: Add unit test for ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
index 12d0b22cabe1..3b43301054b6 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
@@ -332,14 +332,19 @@ static void mbt_kunit_exit(struct kunit *test)
static void test_new_blocks_simple(struct kunit *test)
{
struct super_block *sb = (struct super_block *)test->priv;
- struct inode inode = { .i_sb = sb, };
+ struct inode *inode;
struct ext4_allocation_request ar;
ext4_group_t i, goal_group = TEST_GOAL_GROUP;
int err = 0;
ext4_fsblk_t found;
struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
- ar.inode = &inode;
+ inode = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*inode), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!inode)
+ return;
+
+ inode->i_sb = sb;
+ ar.inode = inode;
/* get block at goal */
ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
@@ -441,15 +446,20 @@ test_free_blocks_simple_range(struct kunit *test, ext4_group_t goal_group,
{
struct super_block *sb = (struct super_block *)test->priv;
struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
- struct inode inode = { .i_sb = sb, };
+ struct inode *inode;
ext4_fsblk_t block;
+ inode = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*inode), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!inode)
+ return;
+ inode->i_sb = sb;
+
if (len == 0)
return;
block = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group) +
EXT4_C2B(sbi, start);
- ext4_free_blocks_simple(&inode, block, len);
+ ext4_free_blocks_simple(inode, block, len);
validate_free_blocks_simple(test, sb, goal_group, start, len);
mbt_ctx_mark_used(sb, goal_group, 0, EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb));
}
@@ -506,16 +516,21 @@ test_mark_diskspace_used_range(struct kunit *test,
static void test_mark_diskspace_used(struct kunit *test)
{
struct super_block *sb = (struct super_block *)test->priv;
- struct inode inode = { .i_sb = sb, };
+ struct inode *inode;
struct ext4_allocation_context ac;
struct test_range ranges[TEST_RANGE_COUNT];
int i;
mbt_generate_test_ranges(sb, ranges, TEST_RANGE_COUNT);
+ inode = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*inode), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!inode)
+ return;
+ inode->i_sb = sb;
+
ac.ac_status = AC_STATUS_FOUND;
ac.ac_sb = sb;
- ac.ac_inode = &inode;
+ ac.ac_inode = inode;
for (i = 0; i < TEST_RANGE_COUNT; i++)
test_mark_diskspace_used_range(test, &ac, ranges[i].start,
ranges[i].len);
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists