| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <mw4yhbmza4idassgbqeiti4ue7jq377ezxfrqrcbsbzsrmfiln@kn7qmqljvswl>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 20:05:58 -0600
From: John Groves <John@...ves.net>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: John Groves <jgroves@...ron.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, john@...alactic.com,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, gregory.price@...verge.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/20] Introduce the famfs shared-memory file system
On 24/02/26 04:58PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 1:16 PM John Groves <John@...ves.net> wrote:
> >
> > On 24/02/26 07:53AM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 07:27:18AM -0600, John Groves wrote:
> > > > Run status group 0 (all jobs):
> > > > WRITE: bw=29.6GiB/s (31.8GB/s), 29.6GiB/s-29.6GiB/s (31.8GB/s-31.8GB/s), io=44.7GiB (48.0GB), run=1511-1511msec
> > >
> > > > This is run on an xfs file system on a SATA ssd.
> > >
> > > To compare more closer apples to apples, wouldn't it make more sense
> > > to try this with XFS on pmem (with fio -direct=1)?
> > >
> > > Luis
> >
> > Makes sense. Here is the same command line I used with xfs before, but
> > now it's on /dev/pmem0 (the same 128G, but converted from devdax to pmem
> > because xfs requires that.
> >
> > fio -name=ten-256m-per-thread --nrfiles=10 -bs=2M --group_reporting=1 --alloc-size=1048576 --filesize=256MiB --readwrite=write --fallocate=none --numjobs=48 --create_on_open=0 --ioengine=io_uring --direct=1 --directory=/mnt/xfs
>
> Could you try with mkfs.xfs -d agcount=1024
>
> Luis
$ luis/fio-xfsdax.sh
+ sudo mkfs.xfs -d agcount=1024 -m reflink=0 -f /dev/pmem0
meta-data=/dev/pmem0 isize=512 agcount=1024, agsize=32768 blks
= sectsz=4096 attr=2, projid32bit=1
= crc=1 finobt=1, sparse=1, rmapbt=0
= reflink=0 bigtime=1 inobtcount=1 nrext64=0
data = bsize=4096 blocks=33554432, imaxpct=25
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0, ftype=1
log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=16384, version=2
= sectsz=4096 sunit=1 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
+ sudo mount -o dax /dev/pmem0 /mnt/xfs
+ sudo chown jmg:jmg /mnt/xfs
+ ls -al /mnt/xfs
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 jmg jmg 6 Feb 26 19:56 .
drwxr-xr-x. 4 root root 30 Feb 26 14:58 ..
++ nproc
+ fio -name=ten-256m-per-thread --nrfiles=10 -bs=2M --group_reporting=1 --alloc-size=1048576 --filesize=256MiB --readwrite=write --fallocate=none --numjobs=48 --create_on_open=0 --ioengine=io_uring --direct=1 --directory=/mnt/xfs
ten-256m-per-thread: (g=0): rw=write, bs=(R) 2048KiB-2048KiB, (W) 2048KiB-2048KiB, (T) 2048KiB-2048KiB, ioengine=io_uring, iodepth=1
..
fio-3.33
Starting 48 processes
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
ten-256m-per-thread: Laying out IO files (10 files / total 2441MiB)
Jobs: 17 (f=170): [_(2),W(1),_(8),W(2),_(7),W(3),_(2),W(2),_(3),W(2),_(2),W(1),_(2),W(1),_(1),W(3),_(4),W(2)][Jobs: 1 (f=10): [_(47),W(1)][100.0%][w=8022MiB/s][w=4011 IOPS][eta 00m:00s]
ten-256m-per-thread: (groupid=0, jobs=48): err= 0: pid=141563: Mon Feb 26 19:56:28 2024
write: IOPS=6578, BW=12.8GiB/s (13.8GB/s)(114GiB/8902msec); 0 zone resets
slat (usec): min=18, max=60593, avg=1230.85, stdev=1799.97
clat (usec): min=2, max=98969, avg=5133.25, stdev=5141.07
lat (usec): min=294, max=99725, avg=6364.09, stdev=5440.30
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 11], 5.00th=[ 46], 10.00th=[ 217], 20.00th=[ 2376],
| 30.00th=[ 2999], 40.00th=[ 3556], 50.00th=[ 3785], 60.00th=[ 3982],
| 70.00th=[ 4228], 80.00th=[ 7504], 90.00th=[13173], 95.00th=[14091],
| 99.00th=[21890], 99.50th=[27919], 99.90th=[45351], 99.95th=[57934],
| 99.99th=[82314]
bw ( MiB/s): min= 5085, max=27367, per=100.00%, avg=14361.95, stdev=165.61, samples=719
iops : min= 2516, max=13670, avg=7160.17, stdev=82.88, samples=719
lat (usec) : 4=0.05%, 10=0.72%, 20=2.23%, 50=2.48%, 100=3.02%
lat (usec) : 250=1.54%, 500=2.37%, 750=1.34%, 1000=0.75%
lat (msec) : 2=3.20%, 4=43.10%, 10=23.05%, 20=14.81%, 50=1.25%
lat (msec) : 100=0.08%
cpu : usr=10.18%, sys=0.79%, ctx=67227, majf=0, minf=38511
IO depths : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued rwts: total=0,58560,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=1
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
WRITE: bw=12.8GiB/s (13.8GB/s), 12.8GiB/s-12.8GiB/s (13.8GB/s-13.8GB/s), io=114GiB (123GB), run=8902-8902msec
Disk stats (read/write):
pmem0: ios=0/0, merge=0/0, ticks=0/0, in_queue=0, util=0.00%
I ran it several times with similar results.
Regards,
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists