linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf test: Use TEST_FAIL in the TEST

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <170905469226.501091.7003094916625866194.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 09:26:04 -0800
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf test: Use TEST_FAIL in the TEST_ASSERT macros instead of -1

On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 17:07:20 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Just to make things clearer, return TEST_FAIL (-1) instead of an open
> coded -1.
> 
> 

Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!

Best regards,
-- 
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>