[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <qfxrbeajea25ckhzx74ieqg7f3baw2pqilliru4djc2a2iii6e@faxw7bgt2vi2>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 11:48:17 -0600
From: John Groves <John@...ves.net>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: John Groves <jgroves@...ron.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, john@...alactic.com,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, gregory.price@...verge.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/20] famfs: Add super_operations
On 24/02/26 12:51PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 11:41:53 -0600
> John Groves <John@...ves.net> wrote:
> > + */
> > +static int famfs_show_options(
> > + struct seq_file *m,
> > + struct dentry *root)
> Not that familiar with fs code, but this unusual kernel style. I'd go with
> something more common
>
> static int famfs_show_options(struct seq_file *m, struct dentry *root)
Actually, xfs does function declarations and prototypes this way, not sure if
it's everywhere. But I like this format because changing one argument usually
doesn't put un-changed args into the diff.
So I may keep this style after all.
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists