linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.211-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 12:56:00 -0600
From: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
 lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
 f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net,
 rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, kuniyu@...zon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.211-rc1 review

Hello!

On 27/02/24 7:26 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.211 release.
> There are 122 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu, 29 Feb 2024 13:15:36 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.211-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

We're seeing new warnings on 32-bits architectures: Arm, i386, PowerPC, RISC-V and System/390:

-----8<-----
   builds/linux/net/ipv4/arp.c: In function 'arp_req_get':
   /builds/linux/include/linux/minmax.h:20:35: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
      20 |         (!!(sizeof((typeof(x) *)1 == (typeof(y) *)1)))
         |                                   ^~
   /builds/linux/include/linux/minmax.h:26:18: note: in expansion of macro '__typecheck'
      26 |                 (__typecheck(x, y) && __no_side_effects(x, y))
         |                  ^~~~~~~~~~~
   /builds/linux/include/linux/minmax.h:36:31: note: in expansion of macro '__safe_cmp'
      36 |         __builtin_choose_expr(__safe_cmp(x, y), \
         |                               ^~~~~~~~~~
   /builds/linux/include/linux/minmax.h:45:25: note: in expansion of macro '__careful_cmp'
      45 | #define min(x, y)       __careful_cmp(x, y, <)
         |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
   /builds/linux/net/ipv4/arp.c:1108:32: note: in expansion of macro 'min'
    1108 |                                min(dev->addr_len, sizeof(r->arp_ha.sa_data_min)));
         |                                ^~~
----->8-----

Bisection points to:

   commit 5a2d57992eca13530ac79ae287243b3ff6b01128
   Author: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
   Date:   Thu Feb 15 15:05:16 2024 -0800

       arp: Prevent overflow in arp_req_get().
       
       commit a7d6027790acea24446ddd6632d394096c0f4667 upstream.

Tuxmake reproducers:

   tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch arm     --toolchain gcc-12 --kconfig davinci_all_defconfig
   tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch i386    --toolchain gcc-12 --kconfig defconfig
   tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch powerpc --toolchain gcc-12 --kconfig maple_defconfig
   tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch riscv   --toolchain gcc-12 --kconfig defconfig

Reverting the change made the build pass again without warnings.

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>


Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@...aro.org